Automated cherry pick of #5325: Fix assumedUsage calculation in TAS#5349
Conversation
Before this change, for each domain present in podset assignment algorithm was adding total requested resources for the whole podset instead of resources actually used by the pods assigned to that domain. This resulted in some workloads with more than 1 podset not fitting in the topology which should have enough resources to accomodate that workload.
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
|
Hi @lchrzaszcz. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
9146a16 to
e0358f2
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 9cefdd704bb947cfcd7a1ea9870cec635a18bd41 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lchrzaszcz, mimowo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
It was not a bug in 0.10, this is just a cleanup |
|
@mimowo: Those labels are not set on the issue: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Cherry pick of #5325 on release-0.10.
#5325: Fix assumedUsage calculation in TAS
For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.